Do you have an explanation for me?
0
I find some surprising levels of training in relation to the obtained percentage rank in the diagnosis (sometimes): BrainBoy-s - percentage rank result: 20% - designated level for training: 3, KlickBoy - percentage rank result: 80% - designated level for training: 2, BrainBoy-s - percentage rank result: 26% - designated level for training: 3, BrainBoy-s - percentage rank result: 9% - designated level for training: 2, Long-Boy - percentage rank result: 73% - designated level for training: 1, Long-Boy - percentage rank result: 82% - designated level for training: 2, SynchBoy - percentage rank result: 73% - designated level for training: 1, Trio-Boy - percentage rank result: 99% - designated level for training: 2, Long-Boy - percentage rank result: 92% - designated level for training: 1,
Do you have an explanation for me?
Do you have an explanation for me?
1 Answer
0
Best Answer
Without the actual data, this is rather difficult to respond to in detail. General answer: this is quite possible. If you look at the last two results: if they were achieved with young children, then this is exactly, what the system should provide. On Trio boy, 99% equals 140 ms. This requires level 1 if you look at the percentage data.
With a six-year-old, 99% is achieved at 65 ms and up. This would be equivalent to level 2. So I trust that all this data is quite correct and the system works as intended.